A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, I was a little music elitist that felt Japanese musicians like Gackt were the epitome of genius, creativity, and expression through music. Needless to say, I very quickly realized I was a bit off (especially with the Gackt part). Moving from artist to artist throughout the years in my journey to find the best musical sounds for my own tastes, I made my way from eastern Asia all the way back to English speaking countries in 2009 when I ~mysteriously~ ended up with two newly released CDs with similar sounds: Foot of the Mountain by Norwegian superstars a-ha, and Hands by British electropop/synthpop artist Little Boots. I don’t really know what exactly compelled me to get these CDs: perhaps it was some divine intervention kind of thing that people go on and on about. However it happened, I’m sure glad it did. The similar-but-different sounds of both a-ha and Little Boots were extremely reminiscent of 1980s pop music around the world (which a-ha was originally a part of, dontcha know) but were still relevant and modern for the new millennium. After I played the two CDs a few hundred times, I moved on to other artists with high degrees of 1980s influences such as La Roux and Marina & the Diamonds. It was only then that I noticed a little trend appearing: somehow I was gravitating toward music that sounded like it was from the ’80s! Gasp! Shocking, right? For me it was a shock because I have always made my dislike for thing in the 1980s so clear to myself and others. The fashion, the music, the movies, the politics: everything about the ’80s was a joke. Or at least I thought. Now, though, I have realized the 1980s were not so bad after all, and in fact they produced some quite amazing things that have changed the world and my own life forever! Amazing!
Let’s take a closer look at exactly what made the 1980s not so bad after all. Some of these things most people will know, and others some people might not. Either way, they are all excruciatingly important to my argument, so pay attention:
1980: Pac-Man1. That’s all that was important, really.
1981: Tohui The Panda2, Josh Groban3, and Benjamin Thomas Barnes4 are all born in this single year. Epic win.
1982: Emoticons and CDs/CD players are created. Hooray! ⌂̺͛ᴖ̲̿ᴥ̲̿ᴖ̺͛⌂
1983: The GNU Project starts up and Hikaru Utada5 is born.
1984: The Apple Macintosh computer and individual Band-Aids are introduced to the world. Plus it was 1984: dystopian society FTW!
1985: a-ha releases their debut album, Hunting High and Low, that produced the hit “Take on Me”. Glory is bestowed upon the world.
1986: Two words: Top Gun6. Although the Legend of Zelda games were probably a bit more successful in the long run, amirite?
1987: Final Fantasy7? Prozac8 in the USA? William Peter Moseley9? What more could a person want?!
1988: Me! Oh, and Anna Popplewell10.
1989: Epic Communism fail = EPIC WIN.
So really, I must admit my emotional defeat and permit the 1980s to revel in all their glory. They deserve it. I never really appreciated all the fantastical and beautiful things the 1980s gave the world that are still extremely relevant today (for the most part). My hate for the 1980s was extremely unjustified, and therefore I am truly grateful that I have now been enlightened as to why those 10 short years were in fact far more awesome than I ever could have fathomed. Hallelujah!
- You should all know what Pac-Man is. †
- Tohui was the 1st panda born in captivity outside of China †
- Josh Groban is a kickass American singer that could take on Celine Dion any day and is addicted to his iPhone †
- The most amazing GQMF on the face of the planet Earth. He is also referred to as Binbons because he is just that important to humanity. †
- Utada is one of Japan’s best selling musical acts in history with over 52 million albums sold †
- I have no words for this movie. Except maybe ‘volley ball’. †
- Final Fantasy being the original game in the series from Japanese game production company, Square †
- Prozac? Prozac! †
- Also referred to as WillMo, he is a super BAMF and a GQMF all at once, along with a bunch of other stuff. You should worship him because a lot of people already do. †
- This girl is perfection so she can be here, too. †
The Algorithm of Bad Fansite Names
You have to admit that you – yes you – have been to a fansite or two in your time. A fansite meaning, specifically, to be a website dedicated to a celebrity or popular topic of some kind (I.E.: a film series) made by an “average Joe” type of fan/admirer who is not affiliated with the subject itself in any formal way. When I was a youngster1, celebrity websites of almost any kind were always official and endorsed by the celebrity and/or their management. Nowadays that is definitely not the case. There are fansites to anything and everything, and there are more often than not multiple ones for a single topic. When there are multiple fansites for a single thing, things can get pretty complicated.
One of the biggest “complexities” of the fansite world is the naming of these sites in regards to the celebrity or topic they are dedicated to. There seems to be a very specific algorithm used by fansite creators to determine just how their domains and site titles are chosen, and I have finally exposed it! Amazing! I shall now explain to you all the extremely difficult and tedious task of choosing a fansite name, but please: do not try this at home!
STEP 1: Make it sound official even though it’s not official.
We all know that if a website claims to be official and thus represent or be endorsed by someone but doesn’t have that credibility, that can result in some big trouble! Oh my, we do not want that. So to avoid any legal issues surrounding representation and/or affiliation, you can’t use the words “official”, “approved”, “endorsed”, “authorized”, “recognized”, or any of those other awesome words because that would be a big boo boo.
STEP 2: Register a .com, .net, or .org with [some form of] the topic’s name in it.
This one actually makes sense to me, though, because you obviously want a domain name that says what the site is about. Keep in mind that even when yahoo.com and google.com were new on the block people had no idea what they were when they saw/heard the name. Thus, if you name your site something that is not correlated to the topic of your site, you might hurt your traffic in the long run. The closer you can get to the actual name of the topic of your site, such as a celebrity’s working name (I.E.: britneyspears.com for Britney Spears), the better. If you need a dash in between the first and last names of a person, you may do that. You may also cut down the first name of a person to a single letter and leave the last name intact if that’s what it takes to get a relevant domain (I.E.: kstewart.com for Kristen Stewart) purchased. Hell, if you’ve got the funds, buy anything and everything you can that is related to the person’s name. It doesn’t really matter as long as it goes to the same place under the same crappy site title which is in step 3.
STEP 3: Use specific “keywords” in your site’s title to make it seem more important and useful than it really is.
There are a lot of words that are used over and over and over by fansites that used to seem really innovative, but because they are used over and over and over, they are definitely not. Oh well! Use them anyway so you can fit in! There are levels of superiority in the keywords, so chose wisely. If there were two fansites to a person/topic with the same title that would be some epic dramarama right there and hate mail or possible hacking would ensue. The highest and most desirable level of keywords consists of thing such as:
celebrity name + “fan”; “fans”; “online”; “network”; “source”; “web”; “daily”
If none of these are available because there are just too damn many fansites for the topic you are making another fansite about, make something up that is vague but overall positive, like “Supergirl” or “We love ____” or another unoriginal name/phrase. If you end up doing this, step 4 will definitely be more important to you!
STEP 4: Pad your site description and content with propagandistic and exaggerated words to infer your site is superior to all others around.
This is a rather crucial step for every fansite and not just those that didn’t get a great domain name or site title. If you want your fansite to seem like it is the cream of the crop regardless of the content you have on it, you have to advertise like it is! Using phrases like “non-stop” and “24/7″ make the site sound as though it is always ready to report news and the latest stuff visitors may want, even though fansite owners can’t be available non-stop, 24/7 to update their sites2. Content should also speak to the visitor on a personal and individual level, so using identifying words like “you” and “your” to directly address the visitor at that moment is a good strategy. The last part of this step is to mix in various words representing quality and excellence throughout a fansite to reassure the visitor that your site is the best site to be at. The most commonplace words/phrases are “best”, “number 1″, “ultimate”, “definitive”, and “premier”3. Try to jam in as many of these as you can in as much space as you can find because invariably the next owner who makes a fansite to the same topic you have a fansite for will utilize this strategy. Thus, you might as well join the club and follow suit because if you don’t say your site is the best then what kind of fansite owner are you, anyway?
Voila! You now know the secret to success in the fansite world! Now that you have been briefed on the most tedious and painstaking steps of the fansite creation process, I highly encourage you to go out and make a fansite for something that already has a half a dozen fansites and see how well you do. Good luck!
- …referring to a time when Google was virtually unknown, social networking had not been coined, and a cell phone could only be used for communicating verbally. †
- If the fansite owner(s) are indeed available non-stop, 24/7 then there are much bigger problems going on that need to be dealt with off the internet entirely. †
- The word “premiere” is probably used more than “premier”, but this is only because people are too stupid to realize the former is inaccurate in the vast majority of cases. Oh well. No biggie, right? †
