Comments for Mia Chimera http://www.miachimera.net ...because being serious is never a serious thing. Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:31:15 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Georgina http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-213 Georgina Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:31:15 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-213 Oh the 80s! I actually went to the museum last week where they had an 80s exhibit - totally awesome. I think I like a lot of 80s movies - such as Back To The Future and Dirty Dancing. Pacman FTW. I love the references to Binbons and WillMo... and Anna, too. :P Oh the 80s! I actually went to the museum last week where they had an 80s exhibit – totally awesome. I think I like a lot of 80s movies – such as Back To The Future and Dirty Dancing.

Pacman FTW. I love the references to Binbons and WillMo… and Anna, too. :P

]]> Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Haley http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-211 Haley Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:34:02 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-211 Wait so your school had like a segment of learning where it was like <em>WHY RONALD REAGAN SUCKED: Chapters 1 - 23789569</em> or what? Because that would be awesome. I would take that class. I didn't think shit like could be taught in the USA! :O Wait so your school had like a segment of learning where it was like WHY RONALD REAGAN SUCKED: Chapters 1 – 23789569 or what? Because that would be awesome. I would take that class. I didn’t think shit like could be taught in the USA! :O

]]> Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Janet http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-210 Janet Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:09:50 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-210 Haha! No, I'm not a robot. I meant over-charged like the super craziness. :) Ronald Reagan is definitely the reason for the wrongness. I remember in Social Work classes we learned all the ways he screwed the country (and the world) over. It was rather informative. Haha! No, I’m not a robot. I meant over-charged like the super craziness. :)

Ronald Reagan is definitely the reason for the wrongness. I remember in Social Work classes we learned all the ways he screwed the country (and the world) over. It was rather informative.

]]> Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Haley http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-209 Haley Sun, 22 Aug 2010 03:48:20 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-209 Over-charged? What do you mean? U ROBOT? Over-charged? What do you mean? U ROBOT?

]]> Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Haley http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-208 Haley Sun, 22 Aug 2010 03:47:53 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-208 OMG. Ronald Reagan is like...the reason for everything wrong with the USA's economy right now but everyone LOVES HIM STILL and I'm like WAT!? And mosdef agree with the music thing. A+ u smart. i like u. OMG. Ronald Reagan is like…the reason for everything wrong with the USA’s economy right now but everyone LOVES HIM STILL and I’m like WAT!? And mosdef agree with the music thing. A+

u smart. i like u.

]]> Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Josh http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-207 Josh Sat, 21 Aug 2010 03:40:08 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-207 Major downfall of the 80's: Ronald Reagan. Other than that, it was a nice decade. Definitely a lot of good music, particularly of the electronic variety. Major downfall of the 80′s: Ronald Reagan. Other than that, it was a nice decade. Definitely a lot of good music, particularly of the electronic variety.

]]> Comment on The ’80s weren’t as bad as I thought. by Janet http://www.miachimera.net/2010/the-80s-werent-as-bad-as-i-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-206 Janet Sat, 21 Aug 2010 03:38:38 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=678#comment-206 Hey, 1984 also was the year of the Janet. I think that may explain why I have the over-charged brain. I'm still not a big 1980's fan, but I think that's a fair list. :) Hey, 1984 also was the year of the Janet. I think that may explain why I have the over-charged brain.

I’m still not a big 1980′s fan, but I think that’s a fair list. :)

]]> Comment on The Algorithm of Bad Fansite Names by Haley http://www.miachimera.net/2010/algorithm-of-bad-fansite-names/comment-page-1/#comment-205 Haley Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:34:10 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=698#comment-205 I honestly cannot believe how cookie-cutter all the big fansites are for every celebrity under the sun. It seems like they all copy each other in the most obvious and blatant ways, some of which including the names of the sites/domains (hence the entry)! Lameeee. :( I have run my <a href="http://anna-popplewell.org/" rel="nofollow">Anna Popplewell site</a> since early 2008 and my <a href="http://www.will-moseley.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">William Moseley site</a> since mid '09, but I've had way more experience with non-English speaking celebrities in regards to fansites since a very young age (around 14 or so; I'm almost 22 now). Regardless of the ethnicity or demographic involved, fansites <em>bore fans</em> when they all have the same crap on them. I try my hardest to come up with some interesting stuff and have a different looking site. I browse the current batches of fansites and pretty much try to do the exact opposite as much as possible. Otherwise I don't see any point in me even running the site myself if mine is just the same as someone else's! D: Poo. I honestly cannot believe how cookie-cutter all the big fansites are for every celebrity under the sun. It seems like they all copy each other in the most obvious and blatant ways, some of which including the names of the sites/domains (hence the entry)! Lameeee. :( I have run my Anna Popplewell site since early 2008 and my William Moseley site since mid ’09, but I’ve had way more experience with non-English speaking celebrities in regards to fansites since a very young age (around 14 or so; I’m almost 22 now). Regardless of the ethnicity or demographic involved, fansites bore fans when they all have the same crap on them. I try my hardest to come up with some interesting stuff and have a different looking site. I browse the current batches of fansites and pretty much try to do the exact opposite as much as possible. Otherwise I don’t see any point in me even running the site myself if mine is just the same as someone else’s! D: Poo.

]]> Comment on The Algorithm of Bad Fansite Names by Siobhan http://www.miachimera.net/2010/algorithm-of-bad-fansite-names/comment-page-1/#comment-204 Siobhan Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:28:12 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=698#comment-204 You post made me laugh, partly because I myself am a fansite owner and have been for for the past 7 years or so. We I first started hardly anyone had domains and sites were more about content and originality. Now people care more about the domains and the site layouts than anything. I still run fan sites, but they're becoming more of a chore than good fun because everyone and anyone is starting fansites on everything and anything. I noticed you have an Anna Popplewell domain - I have been running http://georgie-henley.com for as long as I can remember, but now many preteens have opened Georgie sites, all with domains and I don't know, maybe I'm old and bitter but it was never that easy when I was 13? It's boring now, to have to listen to their drama when I update with the same news as they do. I tend now to stick to sites on less known subjects, namely British, who I just thoroughly enjoy following the careers of! You post made me laugh, partly because I myself am a fansite owner and have been for for the past 7 years or so. We I first started hardly anyone had domains and sites were more about content and originality. Now people care more about the domains and the site layouts than anything.

I still run fan sites, but they’re becoming more of a chore than good fun because everyone and anyone is starting fansites on everything and anything. I noticed you have an Anna Popplewell domain – I have been running http://georgie-henley.com for as long as I can remember, but now many preteens have opened Georgie sites, all with domains and I don’t know, maybe I’m old and bitter but it was never that easy when I was 13? It’s boring now, to have to listen to their drama when I update with the same news as they do.

I tend now to stick to sites on less known subjects, namely British, who I just thoroughly enjoy following the careers of!

]]> Comment on The Algorithm of Bad Fansite Names by Drea http://www.miachimera.net/2010/algorithm-of-bad-fansite-names/comment-page-1/#comment-199 Drea Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:41:44 +0000 http://www.miachimera.net/?p=698#comment-199 It's funny, I'm making a fansite at current for something I'm absolutely rabid about right now, but considering the name of the subject it's impossible to get a related name as it is right now-- but a lot of these steps have gone through my mind, cliche as they may be. Honestly, I wish I could be more clever, and had more ability to create innovative site designs and compelling content, but sooner or later people just cuddle up to familiarity like it's a warm fire on a cold night. I tend to feel as if I'm repeating myself in fansites and the like as well, like if I don't make the most compelling and new content no one's going to give a crap-- I tend to not care, because in the end I'm making the site for something to do, and for people to come around and get information if they need, so there you go. I think I just ranted for no reason. >D Sorry, Hales. <3 That being said, I'll shut up now, but I agree whole-heartedly with what you've said. It’s funny, I’m making a fansite at current for something I’m absolutely rabid about right now, but considering the name of the subject it’s impossible to get a related name as it is right now– but a lot of these steps have gone through my mind, cliche as they may be. Honestly, I wish I could be more clever, and had more ability to create innovative site designs and compelling content, but sooner or later people just cuddle up to familiarity like it’s a warm fire on a cold night.

I tend to feel as if I’m repeating myself in fansites and the like as well, like if I don’t make the most compelling and new content no one’s going to give a crap– I tend to not care, because in the end I’m making the site for something to do, and for people to come around and get information if they need, so there you go.

I think I just ranted for no reason. >D Sorry, Hales. <3 That being said, I'll shut up now, but I agree whole-heartedly with what you've said.

]]>